Pack enough slabs into a subcompact hatchback and you’ll find the rear suspension sagging before the third box hits the floor. The rear bumper is in close contact with the road surface. The front end rises. This is a physical warning label. Your car is overloaded.
Pickup trucks and SUVs can also exhibit this symptom, although they require more mass to bend the frame and compress the springs. But an RV? Even when transporting furniture, electronic devices and more than a dozen people, the height of the vehicle does not change much. Large Motorhomes are designed to carry a lot of cargo. The suspension absorbs it. Can’t feel it.
So how do you know if you’ve crossed the line? How much is too much?
The answer is not a guess. This is math. Specifically, you need to calculate the RV Cargo Capacity (CCC). This is more than just a suggestion. This is a hard limit defined by the manufacturer. Exceeding it risks catastrophic failure.
CCC statement explanation
To determine a safe weight limit, start with the gross vehicle weight (GVWR). This is the maximum total weight that the vehicle is designed to support, including the vehicle itself and all items inside.
Subtract from that what was “always” there.
- Unladen Weight (UVW): This is the weight of the motorhome as it is manufactured at the factory. Fully filled with fuel, coolant and oil. Think of this as “ready to drive” weight.
- Sleeping Capacity Weight Rating (SCWR): This is the assigned weight for the passenger. The manufacturer calculates this by multiplying 154 pounds by the amount of sleeping berth.
- Propane and water: These are heavy. LPG weighs 4.2 pounds per gallon. Fresh water weighs 8.3 pounds per gallon.
Let’s look at a concrete example using a theoretical motorhome.
- GVWR: 20,000 lbs.
- Minus UVW: 14,500 lbs (including full tank)
- Minus SCWR: 924 lbs (6 beds x 154 lbs)
- Minus propane (LP gas): 50.4 lbs (12 gallons x 4.2 lbs)
- Minus fresh water: 207.5 lbs (25 gallons x 8.3 lbs)
Result: 4,318.1 lbs
This 4,318.1 pounds is the cargo carrying capacity. This is the maximum weight you can add in the form of luggage, gear, food and extra water. This is a hard ceiling. Don’t cross it.
Where can I find these numbers? If the manufacturer does not provide the CCC directly, you can calculate the CCC using the GVWR, UVW, SCWR, and fluid weight listed in your owner’s manual or on the manufacturer’s website.
Check the vehicle specifications
Information about cars and trucks is usually published in an online catalog. Below is a snapshot of cargo capacity information for specific makes and models. Note that these numbers represent cubic feet of space, not weight limits, but will give you an idea of volume limits.
Acura cargo capacity
| Year | Model | Volume (cubic feet) |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | MDX | 81.5 |
| 2006 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2006 | RSX | 25.3 |
| 2006 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2006 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2007 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2007 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2007 | RDX | 60.6 |
| 2007 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2007 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2008 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2008 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2008 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2008 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2008 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2009 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2009 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2009 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2009 | TSX | 12.6 |
Acura GVWR
Acura GAWR
Acura GCWR
Acura Curb Weight
Acura Payload
Acura Towing Capacity
Audi cargo capacity
t51z0x8zel929llehu7z
Find the right capacity for your load
The choice of car usually depends on one indicator. How much trash can you cram into the back seat without turning the seats? Or how much space do you have if you need to transport your mountain bike?
General Motors brands dominate mass production. If you need to move furniture, consider a van or SUV. If you’re just shopping for groceries, a compact sedan might be enough. But if you want to move it, you need cubic feet.
Buick Cargo Capacity
Buiek keeps things relatively simple these days. They don’t chase big trucks. They build luxury cruisers and family transports.
In 2006 Terraza became the best-selling model. Offers 136.5 cubic feet of space. It’s a minibus area. Rendezvous follows close behind at 108.9 feet. Rainier is smaller and has a capacity of 80.1 feet. car? Not even close. LaCrosse and Lucerne have maximum heights of 16 feet and 17 feet.
In 2007, Terraza was delisted. Rainier and Rendezvous held true. The sedan didn’t move.
By 2008, the Enclave had arrived. This is a mid-size SUV with plenty of storage space. It has 116.2 feet of cargo space. La Crosse and Lucerne are still stuck at 16 feet and 17 feet.
In 2009, the Enclave was slightly reduced to 115 feet. The sedan didn’t move at all.
Buick key information (2006-2009):
* Largest SUV: 2006 Buick Terraza (136.5 ft3)
* Best Luxury Car: 2006-2009 Buick Lucerne (17 ft3)
* Midsize SUV: 2008-2009 Buick Enclave (115-116.2 ft3)
Cadillac cargo capacity
Cadillac is in a different league. Luxury doesn’t necessarily mean practicality, but the company’s SUVs tell a different story.
Escalade and Escalade ESV are heavy series. The standard 2006 Escalade offers 104.6 feet. The extended ESV model jumps to 131.6 feet. The Escalade EXT is a pick-up version with rear seat cargo space not listed in these specifications. The SRX SUV is 69.5 feet.
Luxury sedans like CTS, DTS, STS and XLR are in short supply. The DTS is the widest sedan at 18.8 feet. The CTS, STS, and XLR models float between 11.6 feet and 13.8 feet. The high-performance V models share the same luggage space as the base model.
For 2007, the Escalade has expanded the space to 108.9 feet. ESV extends to 137.4 feet. The SRX is stuck at 69.5 feet.
Minor changes were made in 2008. CTS Stem grows from 12.5 feet to 13.6 feet. The Escalade and ESV are solid at 108.9 feet and 137.4 feet.
2009 Escalade Hybrid is released. Its size has been significantly reduced to 69.5 feet . This is likely due to the battery packaging. The SRX also grew slightly to 13.8ft (Note: source data shows 2009 SRX as 13.8 and previous years as 69.5. Check specific trim/configuration as data may reflect different gauges or source typos. However, we kept source data at 13.8 for the 2009 TSX and 1 for 3 in.8ft). Take a moment and check the source. The 2009 SRX is listed as 13.8 . From 2006 to 2008 SRX was 69.5 *. This is a big difference compared to the source data. We have to stick to the facts. Source list 69.5 in 2008 and 13.8 in 2009 as of June 2008. Report exactly as given.
mdpseajm4im96je0az0s
Selling Ford: key benefits
Ford’s sales strategy is all about large trucks. If you want to haul cargo, consider an E-Series van or a Super Duty pickup truck. In 2006 and 2007, the E150, E250 and E350 Super Duty models held steady at 256.5 cubic feet. In 2008 and 2009, this amount dropped slightly to 230.6 cubic feet. That’s a small price to pay for a platform that can actually carry stuff.
The F series tells a different trend. The 2006 F-150 offers 37.8 cubic feet of bed space. By 2008, the F-150, F-250, and F-350 were listed without data. This is likely due to the way sources measure “cargo capacity” relative to the bed capacity of late model trucks. The Ranger was a small player at 18.1 cubic feet in 2006 and 2008, but disappeared from the list in 2007 and 2009.
SUVs and crossovers bridge the gap between vans and trucks. The Expedition EL was the king of the Fords during this time. Its capacity started in 2007 at 130.8 cubic feet and are still there. The standard-haul capacity in 2007 was 108.2 cubic feet and rose to 108.3 in 2009. The Explorer held steady at 66.3 cubic feet until rising to 66 in 2008 and 66.1 in 2009.
Small cars don’t have much space. The Focus dropped from 40.2 cubic feet in 2006 to just 13.8 in 2009. The Mustang was never meant to be a transportation vehicle. From 2006 to 2008 it had a capacity of 9.7 cubic feet.
GMC and Hummer: practicality and power
GMC relies heavily on the Savana line for sales. From 2006 to 2009 we had Savana 1500, 2500 and 3500 models 225.1 cubic feet. Very reliable.
There are some differences in the Yukon’s lineup. The standard Yukon dropped from 63.6 cubic feet in 2006 to 60.3 cubic feet in 2007, 2008 and 2009. The Yukon XL hovers around 45.7 to 45.8 cubic feet.
The Acadia entered the conversation in 2007 with 19.7 cubic feet, went up to 25.5 in 2008 and stayed there through 2009. Envoy stayed at 43.7 cubic feet for three years and then disappeared.
Hummer does not focus on diversity. From 2006 to 2009 H2 capacity was 30.7 cubic feet. H3 has a capacity of 29.5 cubic feet. H3T 2009 data is not listed. These are small numbers for such a large car, and they highlight Hummer’s focus on looks over packaging.
Honda: Cargo Space
Honda has done some interesting things with the Fit. In 2006 and 2007 it delivered 41.9 cubic feet. Then in 2009 that number jumped to 57.3 cubic feet. The redesign changed everything.
Civic has been significantly reduced. It started at 72 cubic feet in 2006, dropped to 72.9 in 2007, 35.7 in 2008, and further dropped to 11.5 in 2009. The final numbers for 2009 appear to be either a typo in the source data or just a measurement of a specific area.
Odyssey is a van killer. From 2006 to 2009 the capacity was 147.4 cubic feet. No changes. This is a mobile living room.
The Pilot stayed around 87.6 cubic feet until 2009, when it dropped slightly to 87. The Ridgeline pickup truck has a capacity of 41.4 cubic feet for the fourth year in a row. The S2000 building has 5 cubic feet. This is enough for a helmet.
Hyundai and Infiniti: Entry level restrictions
Hyundai sales are not high. The Elantra went from 13 cubic feet in 2006 to 14.2 in 2007 and 2008. The Sonata was stuck at 16.3 cubic feet from 2006-2009.
The Santa Fe rose slightly to 30.5 in 2006 34.2 in 2007 and 2008. The Tucson has held steady at 22.7 cubic feet for three years. The Entourage minivan offers 32.2 cubic feet for 2007 and 2008.
Infiniti focuses on luxury, not sales. The G35 sedan started at 7.8 cubic feet in 2006 and rose to 13.5 in 2008, but dropped to 7.4 in the 2008 G37.
From 2006 to 2008, the FX35 and FX45 dimensions remained at 64.5 cubic feet. As of 2009, all FX series (now FX35 and FX50 ) sizes are 62 cubic feet. The QX56 is a massive 91.7 cubic feet and was Infiniti’s sales leader from 2006-2009. That has never changed.
Isuzu and Jaguar: The end of an era
Isuzu is almost absent from the data for this period. Between 2006 and 2008 Ascender had a capacity of 80.1 cubic feet. Information for i-280 and i-350 trucks is not shown.
Jaguar is a boutique company. From 2006 to 2008, the XJ had a capacity of 28.6 cubic feet. XK stayed at 16 cubic feet for 3 years.
The XJ8 and XJR stayed at 16.4 cubic feet for 4 years. XK and XKR dropped 11.5 in 2006 to 7.1 in 2007, but rebounded to 10.6 in 2008 and 2009.
The XF was introduced in 2009 and measures 17.7 cubic feet. The XK Coupe also scored a 10.6. Jaguar sales are slow. You buy a car for the sound, not the storage space.
Canonical links and data gaps
The data shows clear gaps. Trucks like the Sierra 1500/2500/3500 and Canyon often have zero or no cargo capacity. This typically means that the data source measures passenger/cargo volume in the vehicle instead of bed space, or the data is missing entirely.
Specs like Ford GVWR, GMC GAWR and Honda GCWR have legal weight limits, but don’t tell you how much “stuff” can fit inside. The number of cubic feet here is the physical space. They didn’t account for wheel bumps, suspension movement, etc.
Jeep utility and luxury car space
The data shows a clear division between these brands in prioritizing sales. Jeep trucks and SUVs top the list of cubic feet. Check out the 2009 Wrangler Unlimited. With the seats folded, the height is 86.8 ft³. It’s amazing. Compare that to a compact crossover or sedan. The numbers have dropped dramatically.
The Jeep Liberty was sold in 2006 and 2007 and had a volume of 69 cubic feet. It was later reduced to 64.2 cubic feet in 2008. Why such a change? Perhaps an update to the packaging or a redesign of the seat mechanism. From 2006 to 2009, the Grand Cherokee’s volume remained stable at 67.4 cubic feet. This consistency is important when you need a known amount of camping gear.
The commander hasn’t changed much either. 68.7 to 68.9 to 68.5. small variations. Compass and Patriots are at 53.6 and 62.7. But watch out for Wranglers. It went from 45.8 in 2006 to 61.2 in 2007. That’s an increase of 15 cubic feet. They fixed the rear seat folding problem and changed the tailgate assembly. Anyway, we’ll get even more in 2007.
The superiority of Kia wagons and crossover limitations
Kia’s range has more body types than Jeep. There are sedans, crossovers and minivans. Sedona is an exception. In 2006, it had a capacity of 141.5 cubic feet. By 2007 and 2008, the capacity had dropped to 121.3 cubic feet. Have we lost space? Or is the remaining space better used? Numbers indicate lower volume. But minivans aren’t just about raw cubic feet, they’re shape is usable.
The Rondo offers 74.4 ft³. Suitable for small crossovers. Sorento and Sportage are around 66 feet. Continuous. But look at that sedan. Amanti and Optima float around 14-15 cubic feet. The Rio 5 hatchback is a wild card. It jumped from 49.6 cubic feet in 2006 to 15.8 cubic feet in 2007. Then in 2008 it went back to 49.6 cubic feet. This looks like either a data error or a major redesign that hasn’t been fully implemented. Or maybe it gained seats in 2007 and lost seats in other years.
The 2009 Borrego is 97.6 ft³. Big SUV. However, the trunk space are still small. 12.2 cubic feet. Not suitable for transporting furniture.
Land Rover luxury vehicle sales
Land Rover is not trying to sell the most cars. They seek glory. But the LR3 is a workhorse. In 2006 and 2007, it was 90.3 cubic feet. It then dropped to 9.9 cubic feet in 2008. what happened? The 2008 LR3 may have different seat and size limits. This could be a gap in the data or a certain cosmetic difference. By 2009, it was 90.3 cubic feet again. So the 2008 numbers are an outlier. Please ignore.
The Range Rover measures approximately 74 cubic feet. The Range Rover Sport stops at 71 cubic feet. The LR2 was launched in 2009 with a volume of 58.9 ft³. less. Expected. If you want space for a Land Rover, buy an LR3. If you want status but don’t mind towing a kayak, the Range Rover Sport is fine.
Excessive efficiency of Lexus
Lexus sedans are small. The SC 430 measures 8.8 cubic feet. It’s a suitcase. It’s not a garage. The GS series floats at about 12-13 cubic feet. The ES 350 has a volume of 14.7 ft³. At 18 cubic feet, the LS 460 is better. The LS 600h corresponds to that.
But Lexus excels in its SUVs. The LX 470 has a volume of 90.4 cubic feet. The RX 330 and RX 400h have a volume of 84.7 cubic feet. For 2008, the RX 350’s volume drops to 38.3 ft³. Then in 2009 it went back to 85 cubic feet. The 2008 numbers may be a mix of seats being raised and seats being lowered. The figures for 2009 are the highest figures available.
The GX 470 has a cargo volume of 77.5 ft³. The new 2008 LX 570 measures 15.5 cubic feet. It then increased to 83.1 cubic feet in 2009. Again, the measurements are inconsistent. The 2009 figures are real load capacity with the seats folded.
Lincoln Navigator Space
Lincoln played in the big boys league. The navigator is a tank. In 2006, it was 104.8 cubic feet. In 2007 and 2008 it was 103.5 cubic feet and in 2009 it was 104.7 cubic feet. The numbers are roughly the same every year. Huge space.
The Mark LT pickup has 47.9 ft³ of space. Mid-size truck bed. It’s not big, but serviceable. The MKX crossover has 69 ft³. The MKZ sedan is small at just 15.8 cubic feet. The City Cabin measures 21.1 cubic feet. New for 2009, the MKS offers 18.7 ft³ of space.
If you need to move your piano, you can buy a navigator. If you want a luxury car to go with your golf clubs, the MKZ or MKS is the way to go. But don’t expect to be able to store your mattress in the MKZ.
Mazda’s versatile selection
Mazda has a mix of sedans, hatchbacks and SUVs. MPV minivans are beasts. In 2006, it was 127 cubic feet. This is a huge deal for a front wheel drive van. However, it disappeared after 2006. Why? Discontinued.
The CX-9 has 100.7 cubic feet of space. SUV with 3 rows of seats. It is very practical. The CX-7’s volume is 58.6 cubic feet. The Tribute is the twin of the Ford Escape and has undergone significant changes. In 2006, it was 66.8 cubic feet. In 2008, it was 29.2 cubic feet. In 2009, it was 66.2 cubic feet. Figures for 2008 may be due to errors or certain revisions. 66 ft³ range is the actual capacity.
The sedan is small. The original Mazda6 was 58.7 cubic feet. It then dropped to 16.6 cubic feet in 2009. This is a significant reduction. Has the design of the seat changed? Or are the figures for 2009 empty? 58.7 cubic feet indicates that the rear seats fold flat. 16.6 ft³ for trunk only.
The Mazda5 minivan still has a volume of 44.4 cubic feet. It’s not big. However, it can be used for daily tasks. RX-8 Rotary Coupe? 7.6 cubic feet. It’s a shoebox.
The practicality paradox of Mercedes-Benz
The Mercedes sedan is compact. C-Class sizes range from 12.2 to 12.4 cubic feet. The E-Class measures 15.9 cubic feet. The S-Class sizes range from 15 to 19.8 cubic feet. The SLK Roadster measures 9.8 cubic feet. SLR McLaren? From 9.6 ft³, it dropped to 7.2 ft³ in 2008. Supercars don’t carry cargo.
However, SUVs and R-classes are different. The R series has 85 cubic feet of seating volume. This is a large MPV disguised as a passenger car. The GL class is 83.3 ft³. The ML class is 72.4 ft³. The G500 and G55 are 79.5 cubic feet. The G Wagon is very spacious.
The ML320 and ML350 have stayed at 72.4 ft³ for years. GL320 and GL450 up to 83.3 ft³. If you want luxury and volume, the R-Class or GL-Class are the answer. These sedans are designed for drivers, not haulers.
Last year of Mercury
Mercury is descending. The Monterey minivan has a volume of 134.3 feet. The biggest on this list. However, it disappeared after 2007. Mountaineer SUV space ranges from 84.7 to 85.8 ft³. Mariner crossover approx 66ft³
yiufr02oydpab0co9h1e
- 2006: The G6 held 11 ft³. GTO pressure is very low 7 ft³. The Grand Prix offers 57 ft³. The Montana SV6 is a whopping 136.5 feet. The solstice is small, only 3.8 feet. The rapids are still 68.6 feet. The Vibe sits at 54.1 feet.
- 2007: G5 comes in 13.9 feet. The G6 extends up to 14 feet. The Grand Prix has been reduced to 16 feet. The summer solstice volume increases by 7.5 ft³. Trent dropped to 32.2 feet. 54.1 feet the atmosphere remains the same.
- 2008: G5 maintains 13.9ft. The G6 is still 14 feet. The G8 is 17.5 feet. The Grand Prix recovered slightly to 45.7 ft³. By the summer solstice it had dropped to 5.4 feet. The rapids returned to 68.6 feet. 54.1 feet the atmosphere remains the same.
- 2009: G5 maintains 13.9 feet. The G6 is still 14 feet. The G8 stays at 17.5 feet. The summer solstice was observed at 5.4 feet. The rapids are still 68.6 feet. Atmosphere dropped to 49.4 feet.
Check Pontiac GAWR, Pontiac GCWR, Pontiac Cargo Capacity, Pontiac Vehicle Weight, Pontiac Payload, Pontiac Towing Capacity.
Porsche cargo capacity
Porsche does not prioritize transporting food. These figures are small by design.
- 2006: Cayenne introduced 62.5 ft³.
- 2008: 911 No information displayed. The Boxster is still 9.9 feet. The Cayenne stays at 62.5 feet. The Cayman offers 14.5 ft³.
- 2009: The 911 Carrera is introduced. Size is 7.24 feet. The Boxster is still 9.9 feet. The Cayenne stays at 62.5 feet. Cayman Stay 14.5ft.
Search Porsche GAWR, Porsche GCWR, Porsche Cargo Capacity, Porsche Vehicle Weight, Porsche Payload, Porsche Towing Capacity.
Saab’s cargo capacity
Saab focuses on sedans and SUVs. The 9-7X is their truck.
- 2006: holds 9-2X 61.6 ft³. The 9-3 offers 14.8 feet. 9-5 is 15.9 ft³. The 9-7X is huge, measuring in at 80.1 feet.
- 2007: The 9-on-3 grew slightly 15 ft³. 9-5 overnight 15.9 feet. The 9-7X stays at 80.1 feet.
- 2008: Held 9-3 15 ft³. 9-5 overnight 15.9 feet. The 9-7X stays at 80.1 feet.
- 2009: 9-3 dropped to 12.4-foot-3. 9-5 overnight 15.9 feet. The 9-7X stays at 80.1 feet.
See Saab GAWR, Saab GCWR, Saab Cargo Capacity, Saab Curb Quality, Saab Load Capacity, Saab Towing Capacity.
Saturn’s cargo capacity
There is something wrong with Saturn
The development of Toyota’s cargo capacity
The 2006 model year shows that Toyota is sticking with its flagship truck volumes. The 4Runner offers 75.1 cubic feet of space. Sequoia recorded a volume of 128.1. The Sienna minivan tops its class at 148.9 cubic feet. Matrix started strong with 53.2. Small cars like the Corolla and Camry have a cargo volume of about 13-16 cubic feet. Trucks such as the Tacoma and Tundra are not listed here.
By 2007, things had changed. The Avalon’s volume increases significantly to 41.4 cubic feet. Highlander Hybrid offers 80.6. The Land Cruiser expands to 90.8. Toyota also added the Yaris to the list, with a capacity of 25.7 cubic feet. The FJ Cruiser has a volume of 66.8 cubic feet. Other car models, such as the Sienna, remained flat at 148.9. The matrix remains at 53.2.
In 2008, the Highlander’s capacity increases significantly to 95.4 cubic feet. The Highlander Hybrid follows with a volume of 94.1. The Land Cruiser’s volume fell slightly to 81.7. The Sequoia volume fell to 120.8. Matrix was finally 61.5. Siena remains at 148.9. Yaris stays 25.7. The FJ Cruiser remains at 66.8.
The year 2009 brought subtle changes. Volume has been reduced to 12.3 cubic feet in the Corolla. Matrix rose again to 61.5. Siena still leads by 148.9. The Sequoia volume remained unchanged at 120.8. The Highlander and Highlander Hybrid retain their high 2008 volumes. Matrix again got a volume of 61.5. Yaris stays 25.7. The Venza is publicly listed, but no data is available.
Toyota’s GAWR and GCWR specifications are very different in defining payload limits. The weight of the car plays a big role here. If exact towing capacity information is required, this information is required separately from the payload.
Volkswagen expands the trunk
Starting in 2006, Volkswagen introduced the Golf and GTI with a capacity of 41.8 cubic feet. The Jetta has a capacity of 16 cubic feet. The Rabbit has an even larger capacity of 46 cubic feet. The Touareg SUV has a capacity of 71 cubic feet. The Beetle Coupe had a volume of 27.1. The convertible is small, only 5 inches. The Passat sedan has 14.2 inches. Phaeton has 13 cubic feet in size.
In 2007, the Eos debuted with a capacity of 10.5 cubic feet. GTI goes up to 46. The Passat wagon is 61.8. The Rabbit remained at volume 46, the Touareg at volume 71 and the Beetle Coupe at volume 27.1. The convertible remained in fifth place and the Jetta in 16th place.
GLI (16) and R32 (43.4) were added to the 2008 lineup. Eos stays on 10.5. GTI got 46 cubic feet, Rabbit 46 cubic feet, Touareg 2 71 cubic feet and Passat Wagon 61.8 cubic feet. Beetle Coupe remained on 27.1.
In 2009, the 141 cubic foot Routan minivan was introduced. Tiguan SUV adds 56.1. The Jetta Sportwagon rose to 66.9. The Rabbit remains at 46. The Touareg 2 remains at 71. The GLI remains at 16. The Eos remains at 10.5. Beetle Coupe remained on 27.1.
Volkswagen’s cargo capacity and vehicle weight vary by region and equipment. GCWR and GAWR specifications are important at high loads. Cargo capacity is highly dependent on engine and suspension settings.
Advantages of a Volvo wagon
Volvo’s 2006 line-up emphasizes its wagon heritage. The V70 has 71.4 cubic feet of space. The XC70 offers 71.4. The XC90 SUV received a volume of 84.9. V50’s volume was 62.9. The S60 sedan is rated at 36.5. S80 is 14.4. S40 is 14.3. The C70 convertible got 12.8.
Most of the volumes remained unchanged in 2007. The S60 dropped to 13.9. S80 rose slightly to 14.9. The XC90 rose to 85.1. V50 remains at 62.9. V70 stays at 71.4. The XC70 remains at 71.4. C70 stays on 12.8. S40 remains on 14.3.
In 2008, the 12.9-cubic-foot C30 was introduced. S40 drops to 12.6. V50 drops to 62.6. V70 expands to volume 72.1. The XC70 drops to 72. The XC90 remains at 85.1. S80 stays on 14.9. S60 increases
