Loading tiles into a subcompact hatchback is a simple lesson in physics. Loading a few boxes compresses the rear suspension until the bumper almost touches the asphalt. The front end lifts. This is obvious. The car is drowning.
Pickup trucks and SUVs also bend under this type of load, but it requires more slabs. Designed for payload.
But an RV? You can load a bunch of tiles into your Class A motorhome and not notice a thing. The suspension is stiff and the frame solid. Your luggage feels weightless. Until it isn’t.
How do you know when you’ve crossed the line? How much is too much?
You need a number called Cargo Carrying Capacity (CCC).
This is not a guess. This is the limit set by the manufacturer for safety reasons. If you exceed this, you risk structural damage, brake damage, or worse. Here’s how to find this number and why math is more important than intuition.
Calculations behind motorhome weight limits
You can’t just guess. You have to calculate. The formula is simple, but the input is special. If you get the variable wrong, the safety load switches off.
Start with Gross Vehicle Weight (GVWR). This is the maximum total mass that the vehicle is designed to carry. Think of it like a roof.
Anything that is not a “commodity” in the traditional sense is deducted from this cap.
Here is the breakdown for a hypothetical 20,000 lb GVWR example:
- From GVWR : 20,000 lbs.
- Subtract Unloaded Vehicle Weight (UVW) : This is the weight of the motorhome full of fuel, oil and coolant. Let’s say it’s 14,500 lbs.
- Running total : 5,500 lbs.
- Subtract Sleep Capacity Weight Rating (SCWR) : This is for humans. The standard weight used by manufacturers is 154 pounds per sleeping position. If there are 6 beds, the weight would be 6 x 154 = 924 lbs.
- Running total : 4,576 lbs.
- Minus weight of propane (LPG) : Propane weighs 4.2 pounds per gallon. A typical 12-gallon tank weighs 50.4 pounds.
- Running total : 4,525.6 lbs.
- Minus the weight of fresh water : Water is heavy at 8.3 pounds per gallon. A standard 25-gallon tank adds 207.5 pounds.
- Final CCC : 4,318.1 lbs.
that’s it. This is the maximum cargo limit. Furniture, household appliances, groceries and additional water tanks all come out of this bucket.
“For your safety, do not exceed RV CCC.”
Where to Find Your Numbers
If you don’t have a scale, you don’t have to guess. This information is provided by the manufacturer. Check your owner’s manual. Look for the certification sticker on the door frame.
You can also search online. Most major RV and car manufacturers publish GVWR, UVW, and CCC specifications on their support sites.
If you drive a car, the concept is similar, but it’s usually labeled as “loadable” or “maximum load”. The principles remain the same. Be careful not to exceed the total axle or Curb Weight.
Quick guide to the most important brands
Finding a specific cargo capacity can be tricky if you don’t have the VIN handy. Below is a snapshot of the volume capacity (in cubic feet) of some models from 2006-2009. Note that cubic feet is a measure of volume, not weight. You need to know the density of the product you are packing.
Acura Cargo Volume (3 feet)
| Year | Model | Cargo Volume |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | MDX | 81.5 |
| 2006 | RL | 13.1 |
| 2006 | RSX | 25.3 |
| 2006 | TL | 12.5 |
| 2006 | TSX | 13.2 |
| 2007 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2007 | RDX | 60.6 |
| 2008 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2008 | RSX | 60.6 |
| 2009 | MDX | 83.5 |
| 2009 | TSX | 12.6 |
*See: Acura GVWR, payload and towing capacity. *
Audi Cargo Volume (ft³)
| Year | Model | Cargo Volume |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A3 | 54.6 |
| 2006 | A4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | A6 | 15.9 |
| 2006 | A8 | 14.6 |
| 2006 | S4 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | TT | 24.2 |
| 2007 | Q7 | 88.7 |
| 2007 | S6 | 13.9 |
| 2008 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2008 | A5 | 16.1 |
| 2008 | R8 | 3.5 |
| 2009 | A4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | S4 | 10.2 |
| 2009 | S5 | 16.1 |
| 2009 | TT | 8.8 |
*See also Audi GVWR, GAWR and GCWR specifications. *
BMW Cargo Volume (ft³)
| Year | Model | Cargo Volume |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 325 | 325 12 |
| 2006 | 330 | 330 12 |
| 2006 | 530 | 530 14 |
| 2006 | M3 | 9.5 |
| 2006 | X3 | 71 |
| 2006 | X5 | 54.4 |
| 2007 | 328 | 328 11.1 |
| 2007 | 335 | 335 12 |
| 2007 | X5 | 61.8 |
| 2007 | Z4M | 10.6 |
| 2008 | 128i | 128i 13.1 |
| 2008 | M3 | 12 |
| 2008 | X6 | 59.7 |
| 2009 | 328i | 328i12 |
| 2009 | 535i | 535i 14 |
| 2009 | M6 | 13 |
| 2009 | X5 | 61.8 |
*See also BMW Curb Weight, payload and towing capacity information. *
Overall picture
You might look at these numbers and think, “I have a pickup truck. I don’t need a diagram.”
you might be right. But when you’re towing a trailer or loading a vehicle for cross-country move, the distinction between “space” and “weight” can quickly become blurred. The cubic feet tell you what fits. GVWR and CCC tell you if it’s survive the trip.
The manufacturer list above is not exhaustive. This is the starting point. For others, you’ll need to take a closer look at the specifications. Honda, Ford, Chevrolet, Toyota – they all have similar data points.
What should I do if it is not on the chart? Aftermarket equipment?Solar panel? Extra batteries?
These do not appear in the factory volume numbers. Add weight. Every pound you add, the remaining CCC decreases.
The calculation is easy. The consequences of ignoring it are not.
Buick’s Volume Leaders and Sedans
Buick’s sales strategy was different. Terraza is more than just an SUV. It was a rolling warehouse. The 2006 Buick Terraza’s cargo capacity is 136.5 cubic feet. This number didn’t change much until the model got shelved. Although smaller, the Rainier is still handy for gearheads who need skis and wood, with a capacity of 80.1 cubic feet.
The sedan is intended for occasional trips to the grocery store. Space is tight in both La Crosse and Lucerne. Over the years, the 16 to 17 cubic feet. When you buy a 2007 LaCrosse, you get the same 16 cubic feet of space as the 2006 model. In 2008, the Enclave experienced a big shift.
The cargo capacity of the 2008 Buick Enclave is huge. The started is 116.2 cubic feet. By 2009, this amount had dropped slightly to 115 cubic feet. Why the drop? Likely a package adjustment or a sensor bloat. Either way, it’s the only Buick with serious hauling capabilities.
Cadillac’s Luxury and Utility Split
If you want to haul a grand piano or an old CTS-V, look no further than Cadillac. The Escalade series dominates utility sector. The standard 2006 Escalade measures 104.6 cubic feet. The ESV version increases this to 131.6 cubic feet. For families using strollers or ski racks, this makes a huge difference.
By 2007, Cadillac bumped the numbers. The standard Escalade has 108.9 cubic feet of volume. The ESV has a volume of 137.4 cubic feet. These figures held steady through 2009. In 2009, the Escalade Hybrid joined the lineup, with a capacity of 69.5 cubic feet. It lags behind the gasoline model because the battery takes up more space in the back.
EXT is a strange beast. Looks like a truck. Runs like a truck. However, its carrying capacity is listed as a dash. Why? The bed was covered. This is not a traditional trunk or hatch in the SUV sense.
The sedan and coupe market is tight. In 2006 and 2007, the CTS and CTS-V shared 12.5 cubic feet. It then went up to 13.6 cubic feet in 2008, where it stayed there. The DTS is slightly more spacious at 18.8 cubic feet. The STS and STS-V are a stuck in the 13.8 cubic feet.
XLR and XLR-V are low-slung convertibles. It’s not about packing things into a moving truck. The capacity is 11.6 cubic feet. Enough for two golf bags or a week’s worth of bags.
Chevrolet’s Workhorse Dominance
Chevrolet is owned the commercial van segment. Between 2006 and 2009, the Chevrolet Express’ cargo capacity was 225.1 cubic feet. It doesn’t matter if you buy the 1500, 2500 or 3500 model. The box was the box. This is a reliable tool for those who want to transport cargo without buying a truck.
SUVs are also very capable. As of 2007, the Suburban 1500 and 2500 have a capacity of 137.4 cubic feet. The Tahoe has slightly less capacity at 108.9 cubic feet. In this window, these figures did not change from year to year. The 2008 and 2009 Tahoe Hybrid has the same 108.9 cubic feet as the regular Tahoe.
The Traverse made headlines in 2009 with a capacity of 117.5 cubic feet. This is a new product that bridges the gap between the TrailBlazer and the Suburban. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, the TrailBlazer itself has a capacity of 80.1 cubic feet.
Trucks were the odd ones out. Both the Silverado and Avalanche lines have a dashes for cargo capacity. Why? Because it’s a pickup truck. The cargo area is the bed. Measuring in cubic feet is confusing due to the configuration of the cab and the tailgate. Tahoe and Suburban are closed boxes. Easier to measure. Now it’s easier to compare.
The crossover/utility vehicles were interesting. The Uplander has a capacity of 120.1 cubic feet. The 2006 TrailBlazer EXT has a capacity of 107.4 cubic feet. The HHR panel is a minivan killer with a capacity of 62.7 cubic feet. The standard HHR is slightly smaller at 57.7 cubic feet.
Small cars were tight. The Cobalt has a capacity of 13.9 cubic feet. The Malibu has a volume of 15.1 to 15.4 cubic feet. The Impala is slightly larger at 18.6 cubic feet. The Aveo 5 has 42 cubic feet of space, which is decent for a subcompact. In later years, the standard Aveo was much smaller at 12.4 cubic feet.
A Corvette is a sports car. In 2006 and 2009, it was 22.4 cubic feet, dropping to 11 cubic feet in 2007 and 2008. Body changes in 2005 (and after) may have affected trunk space. It’s always small.
Chrysler’s Minivan Mastery
Chrysler isn’t trying to be cool. They tried to be useful. Town & Country is the king of this era. In 2006, it offered 146.7 cubic feet. By 2007, it had dropped to 144 cubic feet. In 2008 and 2009, this value remained at 143.8 cubic feet. It was consistent. It was big. This is very practical.
The PT Cruiser is a retro choice. It started big in 2006 with a capacity of 92.2 cubic feet. Then in 2007 it dropped to 62.7 cubic feet and stayed there. This change may be due to the interior packaging or rear seat configuration. It was still usable for larger items.
The Pacifica is another minivan option. In 2006, it was 62.7 cubic feet. In 2007, it rose to 92.2 cubic feet. In 2008, this volume returned to 62.7 cubic feet. As of 2009, model was being phased out or restructured and are no longer listed.
The sedan is crowded. The 300 and 300C start at 15.6 cubic feet. In 2008, its volume jumped to 17.2 cubic feet, but in 2009 it returned to 15.6 cubic feet. The Sebring was even smaller, at 11.3 cubic feet in 2006 and 13.6 cubic feet for the rest of the years.
The Aspen is a medium-sized SUV. From 2007 to 2009, it had a capacity of 102.4 cubic feet. The Aspen Hybrid matches that number. This is a solid utility vehicle with very few changes.
Crossfire is a sports car. In 2006 and 2007, the capacity was 6.5 cubic feet. In 2008, the capacity increased to 7.6 cubic feet. It’s small. You buy it for the engine, not the storage space.
Dodge’s Ram Power and Van Utility
Dodge is divided into trucks and vans. Sprinter vans were the heavy hitters. Production of the Sprinter Van 2500 began in 2006 and has a capacity of 247 cubic feet. Raised to 318 cubic feet in 2007
Why cargo space dimensions are more important than towing
You can see the towing capacity by looking at the technical data. The payload is displayed. The weight of the vehicle is displayed. But when you really need to prepare for a weekend trip or move the couch, nothing helps. You need to know how many cubic feet of junk your vehicle can swallow. In this case, cargo carrying capacity data is the only metric that matters.
The numbers below cover 2006-2009 models. These are accurate. The measurements were taken with the rear seats folded. If you have three rows of seats, those numbers vanish. See details.
Ford Cargo Bay Reality Check
Ford dominates the truck market, but its space in sedans and coupes is ridiculous. The 2006 Crown Victoria has 20.6 cubic feet of space. Enough for a few suitcases and a bag of ice. The E-Series vans is king here. The E-150 and E-250 both offer 256.5 cubic feet of space. The E-350 Super Duty matches that exactly. If you need to move a refrigerator, you take the van.
The Escape SUV is consistent. 2006-2008 models have a capacity of 66.3 cubic feet. In 2006, the Hybrid’s capacity is slightly reduced to 65.5 cubic feet. By 2008, the hybrid rose back to 66 cubic feet. Don’t let the hybrid tag fool you into thinking you’re missing out on important space. You don’t.
The truck tells a different story. The Ranger offered 18.1 cubic feet of capacity in 2006 and 2008. The F-150? The data shows a dash. Why? Because the length of the bed varies greatly. Standard bed, long bed, crew cab. This number is useless if You don’t your configuration. The same goes for the F-250 and F-350. You can’t make generalizations about a truck cargo space without knowing its wheelbase.
Focus sedan is small. In 2006 and 2007, it was 40.2 cubic feet. By 2009, it was reduced to 13.8 cubic feet. This is a big drop. The 2009 model may have different dimensions or a significantly changed design. The Fusion is small at 15.8 cubic feet. The Mustang is even worse at 9.7 cubic feet. If you are transporting large items, you are driving the wrong vehicle.
GMC Utility Vehicles and Savana dominance
GMC has the same essence as Chevrolet, but the brand is important. The Savana vans are the heavy lifters. From 2006 to 2009, the Savana 1500, 2500 and 3500 each offered 225.1 cubic feet of space. It won’t change. It’s a brick. If you need a work van, this is your reference.
SUVs are where people get confused. The flow rate of the Yukon River varies from year to year, but ranges from 60.3 to 63.6 cubic feet. The 2006 model is even larger at 63.6 cubic feet. The 2007 model dropped to 60.3. The 2008 and 2009 models remained at 60.3. The Yukon Hybrid is small. Only 16.9 cubic feet. The battery pack takes up this space.
The Yukon XL is an extended version. Capacity is 45.7-45.8 cubic feet. That seems low compared to the standard Yukon, but it was probably measured with all the seats up or folded in a certain configuration that limits expansion. The Acadia was launched in 2007 with an initial capacity of 19.7 cubic feet, growing to 25.5 cubic feet in 2008. It was small at first, but the consistent.
The Envoy has been stuck at 43.7 cubic feet for four years. It doesn’t develop. It just exists. Sierra trucks also show dashes for cargo space. Due to the length of the bed and the size of the cabin, we cannot offer a single number. You need to check the specific trim.
Honda Efficiency and Odyssey exceptions
Honda measures space efficiently. Civic is a compact sedan. In 2006 offers 72 cubic feet and in 2007 it sank 72.9 cubic feet. That’s a lot for a small car. In the 2008 model year, model drops to 35.7 cubic feet. The 2009 model drops it further to 11.5 cubic feet. This suggests a change in the measurement method or a redesign that would significantly reduce trunk space. If you’re looking for volume, be careful when buying a 2009 Civic.
There were years when the Accord was smaller than the Civic. In 2006, it was 12.8 cubic feet. It jumped to 14 cubic feet in 2007, but dropped to 11.9 cubic feet in 2008 and 2009. That’s a tough number. The Civic Hybrid and Accord Hybrid have always been smaller, around 11.2-11.5 cubic feet.
Odyssey is the clear winner. It holds 147.4 cubic feet for every year listed. From 2006 to 2009 it has not changed. This is a minivan. It is built for this. If you need to haul kids, gear, and groceries, the Odyssey is the only sensible choice in this dataset.
The CR-V is small at 10.4 cubic feet. The Pilot is even larger, at 87-87.6 cubic feet. The Ridgeline truck has 41.4 cubic feet of cargo space. This is consistent. The element is large at 74.6 cubic feet. This is a box on wheels. This makes sense.
Hummer vs. Isuzu: Off-road utility vs. practicality
Hummer H2 and H3 are not designed for cargo transportation. They are built for presence. The H2 has a volume of 30.7 cubic feet. The H3 has a capacity of 29.5 cubic feet. These numbers remained unchanged from 2006 to 2009. The H3T is a pickup version and has no data. Maybe the beds are too different in size or the model is too narrow.
By 2009, Isuzu’s barely relevant. From 2006 to 2008, the Ascender had a capacity of 80.1 cubic feet. It’s a big SUV. The i-280, i-350, i-290 and i-370 models have a dashes for cargo space. These are mid-size trucks. As with Ford and GMC trucks, cargo capacity is determined entirely by bed length. You can’t guess. You need to know the cab configuration.
Hyundai and Infiniti: the luxury gap
Hyundai is practical. The Sonata has a capacity of 16.3 cubic feet. The Elantra is similar, with 13-14.2 cubic feet of volume. From 2006 to 2007, the capacity of the Santa Fe increased from 30.5 cubic feet to 34.2 cubic feet. It stays at this level. The Tucson is small, just 22.7 cubic feet. The Entourage minivan has 32.2 cubic feet of space. That number seems small for a minivan, but it’s probably measured with the seats up.
Infiniti is where luxury meets limited space. The G35 and G37 sedans are small. In 2006 and 2007, it was 7.8 cubic feet. In 2008 it was 13.5. In 2009 it was 7.4. The M35 and M45 are even larger at 14.9 cubic feet. They remain static. The QX56 SUV is huge. 91.7 cubic feet. It won’t change. This is a full-size luxury hauler.
The FX series dropped from 64.5 cubic feet to 62 cubic feet in 2008-2009. The 2008 EX35 is even smaller at 18.6 cubic feet. Luxury crossover vehicles often sacrifice space for style. Infinity data supports this trend.
Questions about Jaguars and limousines
Jaguar sedans are beautiful. they are not practical. The XF is new for 2009 and has a capacity of 17.7 cubic feet. The XJ8 and XJR have a capacity of 16.4 cubic feet. XK and XKR are coupes. Depending on the year and model, it holds 7.1 to 11.5 cubic feet.
Jeep Utility: Wrangler and Commander Edge
Carrying luggage in a Jeep largely depends on whether you buy a wheelie box or a luxury cruiser. Commander and Grand Cherokee offer serious volume. In 2006, the Commander measures 68.7 cubic feet. The Grand Cherokee follows with a score of 67.4. Liberty is the king of the lineup with 69 cubic feet. But if you want raw space, don’t choose the Cherokee. You looked at the Wrangler Unlimited.
The compact model is a game changer. The Compass and Patriot were launched in 2007. The Compass offers 53.6 cubic feet of space. The Patriots are higher at 62.7. However, the Liberty held steady at 69 cubic feet until 2008, when it dropped to 64.2 cubic feet. Why cut? Maybe they were tightening the sheet metal. Or maybe I’m just guessing. That’s what data is.
The Wrangler Unlimited is one of the best. It debuted in 2008 and has a cargo capacity of 86.8 cubic feet. That’s a big difference from the two-door Wrangler, which varies from 45.8 to 61.2 cubic feet depending on the model year. The four-door is not just about practicality. It suggests a different way of life.
Kia Family Haulers and Sedan
Kia wasn’t just making cheap sedans in the mid-2000s. They make vans for people who refuse to buy a minivan brand. Sedona is a beast. In 2006, it was an impressive 141.5 cubic feet. In 2007 and 2008, the number dropped slightly to 121.3. It’s still big.
The Sportage and Sorento are really their bread and butter. Both cars start at 66.4 cubic feet, and both are from 2006. The Sportage stays at that level for 2008. The Sorento? Same story. 66.4 cubic feet. Every year. Reliable volume.
Next is a small car. Optima is tight. In 2006 and 2007, it was 14.8 cubic feet. The Rio was worse. 11.9 cubic feet. But the hatchback tells a different story. In 2006, the Rio 5 had a capacity of 49.6 cubic feet. In 2007, it dropped to 15.8 cubic feet. Then in 2008 it went up to 49.6 cubic feet. Spectra 5 offers consistent performance. From 2006 to 2009, it was 52.8 cubic feet.
The Rondo was introduced in 2007 and has a capacity of 74.4 cubic feet. This figure continued until 2008. And when the Borrego arrived in 2009, it brought 97.6 cubic feet. It’s not as big as the Sedona, but it’s good enough for a midsize SUV.
Land Rover: Luxury meets off-road reality
Land Rover competes in different series. Range Rover is the flagship. In 2006, it offered 74.9 cubic feet. The number remained stable in 2007, but dropped to 35.1 in 2008. That’s just over half the space. Why? Style changes. Internal packaging. Whatever the reason, the luxury came at a cost to volume.
LR3 is a realistic option. In 2006, its volume was 90.3 cubic feet. The amount remained at this level in 2007. Then it dropped dramatically to 9.9 cubic feet in 2008. This is a catastrophic decline. Did they remove the back seat? Or is it just a typo in the specs? Nevertheless, in 2009, LR3 returned to 90.3.
Range Rover Sport is always the same. 71 cubic feet. Every year from 2006 to 2009. There was no drama. Volume only.
The LR2 was added in 2009 and has a capacity of 58.9 cubic feet. It’s smaller. Focus more on cities. But for those who need to a Defender replacement with a leather interior, it is possible.
Lexus: precision technology, Modest Trunks
Lexus doesn’t believe in wasting space. Or maybe you just put the driver’s seat first. ES 330 and ES 350 have very little space. In 2006, it was 14.5 cubic feet. In 2007, it was 14.7 cubic feet. This is the sedan segment.
The IS 250 and IS 350 are even tighter. 13 cubic feet. GS model? 12.7 cubic feet. SC430? Only 8.8 cubic feet. You weren’t putting luggage in a convertible coupe.
But SUVs are a different story. The RX 330 and RX 400h offer 84.7 cubic feet. For the RX 350, that number rose to 85 cubic feet in 2007 and 2009. In 2008, that number dropped to 38.3 cubic feet. Maybe they are testing a different interior.
The GX 470 is a tank. 77.5 cubic feet. Every year. The LX470 is larger. 90.4 cubic feet. Then came the LX 570. In 2008 it was still small. 15.5 cubic feet. But by 2009, the number had risen to 83.1. The redesign changed everything.
Lincoln: The Navigator Advantage
Lincoln didn’t mess around. The Navigator was the volume king. In 2006, it offered 104.8 cubic feet. In 2007 and 2008, the number dropped slightly to 103.5. Then it went up to 104.7 in 2009. This is a moving cargo fortress.
The Mark LT is a pickup version. 47.9 cubic feet. Continuous. No changes.
The MKX is a crossover. 69 cubic feet. Annually 2007-2009.
Sedans are for people who don’t need space. The Town Car offered 21.1 cubic feet. MKZ? 15.8 cubic feet. The 2006 Zephyr was 15.8. In 2009, MKS was 18.7. This is a luxury brand. Luxury goods rarely come in small boxes.
Mazda: Mazda5 and CX-9
Mazda knows how to make useful cars. Mazda5 moves people. 44.4 cubic feet. Every year from 2006 to 2009. Not surprising. Pure practicality.
The CX-9 is a large SUV. 100.7 cubic feet. From 2007 to 2009. One of the widest crossovers in its class.
The Tribute is the twin of the Ford Escape. In 2006, it offered 66.8 cubic feet. In 2008, it fell on 29.2. The 2009 model returns to 66.2. The 2008 hybrid version is smaller. 27.8 cubic feet. The weight of the battery takes up space.
MAZDA3 has grown over time. In 2006, it was 31.2 cubic feet. In 2007, it was 43.8. It stayed there through 2009. In 2006, the Mazda6 started was 58.7 cubic feet. Until 2009, the number was 16.6 cubic feet. The redesign killed the volume.
The RX-8 is a rolling sports car. 7.6 cubic feet. MX-5? 5.3 cubic feet. You buy these cars for the driving experience. Not for groceries.
Mercedes-Benz: AMG power and space in the R-series
The 2008 Mercedes had a strange quirk. The G500 and G55 offer 79.5 cubic feet. But The ML models? 72.4 cubic feet. The GL model is larger. 83.3 cubic feet. The R class is a hidden gem. 85 cubic feet. It was a minivan with a suit.
Both the SLK and SL classes are small classes. 9.8 and 10.2 cubic feet. The SLR McLaren is small. 9.6 cubic feet. Then it dropped to 7.2 in 2008.
S class and E class are the same. 15.9-19.8 cubic feet. The CL level has moved between 12.3 and 12.
Mini Cooper and Clubman storage limits
The Minis of the mid-2000s weren’t that “spacious”. However, the freight capacity figures for the company’s core product line are consistent. The 2006 Cooper Hardtop has a cargo capacity of 25 cubic feet. In 2007, this number dropped to 24 cubic feet and remained there until 2009. Convertibles are smaller. From 2006 to 2008, it had a capacity of 21.4 cubic feet. No changes.
Clubman is a viable option. In 2008 it offered 32.8 cubic feet of space, and in 2009 it brought that figure to the John Cooper Works version as well. The JCW hardtop does not get extra space on top of the base hardtop. It remains 24 cubic feet. If you need more than 21.4 cubic feet of space, skip the convertible.
Mitsubishi utility and trunk
Mitsubishi’s product range includes sports coupes and heavy trucks. The Eclipse was small is small. From 2006 to 2009, it offered 15.7 cubic feet of space. Galant was also tight. In the same year, its volume was 13.3-13.3 cubic feet. The Lancer starts at 11.3 in 2006 and increases to 11.6 in 2008 and 2009.
SUVs tell a different story. In 2006, the Endeavor was a 76.4-cubic-foot beast. In 2007 and 2008, it shrank to 40.7. Outlander swings wide. It hit 60.3 in 2006, dropped to 36.2 in 2007, but jumped to 72.6 in 2008. The 2006 Montero is a whopping 91.7 cubic feet. The 2006 Raider pickup had a offered 37.1 cubic feet and was discontinued in 2007 and 2008.
Nissan trunk and loading capacity
Nissan’s loading capacity varies by model. The 350Z was tight. From 2006 to 2008, it had a capacity of only 4.1 cubic feet. The GT-R was introduced in 2009 and had a capacity of 8.8 cubic feet. It’s better, but not by much.
Altima has dropped significantly. It started at 15.6 cubic feet in 2006, dropped to 15.3 cubic feet in 2007, and was halved to 7.4 cubic feet in 2008 and 2009. The same goes for the Maxima. In 2006 and 2007, it had a capacity of 15.5 cubic feet, which dropped to 14.2 cubic feet in 2009.
large SUVs were where Nissan. From 2006 to 2009, the Armada offered 97.1 cubic feet of space. Quest was massive capacity. It started at 148.7 in 2006, dropped slightly to 145.7 in 2007, but rebounded to 148.1 in 2008 and 2009. The Murano was 81.6 in 2006 and 2007, but dropped to 64 in 2009. The Pathfinder stayed steady at 79.2.
Versa is a surprising contender. In 2007 and 2009, it offered 50.4 cubic feet of capacity. Rogue capacity is inconsistent. In 2008, they were 98 cubic feet, which dropped to 28.9 cubic feet in 2009. There were also changes in the Sentra. It started at 11.6 in 2006, jumped to 13.1 in 2007, jumped to 97 in 2008 and returned to 50.4 in 2009. The Xterra held steady at 65.7 cubic feet from 2006 to 2009. For many years, Frontier and Titan never listed the car’s capacity.
Pontiac trunk breakdown
Pontiac is going out of business, but the figures are still there. The G6 started in 2006 with 11 cubic feet and leveled out to 14 cubic feet from 2007-2009. Grand Prix is smaller than you think. It was 57 in 2006, dropped to 16 in 2007, and rose to 45.7 in 2008 and 2009.
The GTO is small. In 2006, it had a capacity of only 7 cubic feet. The 2008 and 2009 G8 has a capacity of 17.5 cubic feet. The Solstice is a sports car. It was 3.8 in 2006, improved to 7.5 in 2007, and stabilized at 5.4 in 2008 and 2009.
Vibe was the practical option. From 2006 to 2008, the rating was 54.1, but in 2009 it dropped slightly to 49.4. Torrent was inconsistent. It was 68.6 in 2006, dropped to 32.2 in 2007, and returned to 68.6 in 2008 and 2009. The 2006 Montana SV6 was a huge 136.5 cubic feet. It did not appear for several years after that. G5 in 2007–2009 was 13.9.
Porsche storage restrictions
Porsche isn’t known for space. The numbers reflect this. In 2008, the 911 had no stated capacity. The 2009 Carrera model has a capacity of 7.24 cubic feet. That’s barely enough for a weekend bag.
The Boxster was consistent. In 2008 and 2009, it offered 9.9 cubic feet of capacity. The Cayman is slightly larger. It held 14.5 in both years. Cayenne is the only realistic option. It was offered in 2006 and 2008 with a 62.5 cubic foot capacity and possibly in 2009, but was not available that year. There is little data. The 911 did not enter the market in 2006 or 2008. Only Carrera models are listed for 2009.
Saab’s cargo capacity
Saab’s lineup was small, but stable. 9-3 offered 14.8 in 2006 and 15 in 2007 and 2008, but dropped to 12.4 in 2009. That’s a bit of a decline. The 9-5 was consistent. In the years 2006-2009 it was 15.9.
The 9-7X is a truck. From 2006 to 2009, it delivered 80.1 cubic feet. No changes. The 9-2X was only introduced in 2006 and has a capacity of 61.6 cubic feet. It did not appear again for several years. 9-3 and 9-5 are compact sedans. Don’t expect too much space.
Saturn storage figures
Saturn dies. The numbers reflect a shrinking lineup. The Ion started at 14.2 in 2006 and went up to 14.7 in 2007. That wasn’t the case in 2008 or 2009. The Aura stayed at 14.9 from 2007 to 2009. The Aura Hybrid from the same year is slightly lower at 13.1.
The Outlook was huge. From 2007 to 2009, it delivered 115.9 cubic feet. No changes. The Relay was massive in 2006 and 2007 at 26.9 cubic feet and 136.5 cubic feet. It did not appear in 2008 and 2009. The Sky was small. In 2007-2009 it was 5.4.
The VUE varied. It started at 30.8 in 2006, rose to 63.8 in 2007, dropped to 56.4 in 2008, but dropped again to 29.2 in 2009. The VUE Hybrid mirrored this. 63.8 in 2007, 56.4 in 2007
Toyota’s changing footprint
Toyota’s 2006 lineup shows a huge difference between practicality and bulk. The Sienna reigns supreme with 148.9 cubic feet, followed by the Sequoia’s 128.1 cubic feet. If you’re hauling cargo in a sedan, you’ll likely see the numbers in single digits or small 10s. The Avalon has 14.4 cubic feet, while the Camry ups that to 16.7 cubic feet. Corolla is a little behind on 13.6. SUVs tell a different story. The 4Runner’s volume is 75.1 cubic feet, while the RAV4’s volume is just 73 cubic feet. The Matrix is the king of small station wagons with a volume of 53.2 cubic feet. In 2006, the freight transport of hybrid cars was in its infancy. The Highlander Hybrid scores a significant 10.5 compared to the gasoline Highlander’s 39.7. Battery packs take up space.
By 2007, things got weird. The Avalon’s volume jumps to 41.4 cubic feet. This is a significant increase. Is there a difference in how the seats are folded? The data says nothing. The Land Cruiser’s score also increased from 20.8 in 2006 to 90.8. The Highlander Hybrid finally topped the gas-powered car with a score of 80.6. FJ Cruiser enters the chat at 66.8. The Yaris adds 25.7, which is respectable for a subcompact.
Fine-tuned for 2008, the gasoline version of the Highlander explodes to 95.4 cubic feet. The hybrid got almost 94.1. The Sequoia index fell to 120.8. The Land Cruiser received a score of 81.7. The matrix stabilized at 53.2. There have been no major changes in the sedan segment. Camry is 15 and Corolla 13.6. Prius scored 14.4 points. FJ Cruiser’s rating is 66.8.
In 2009, the matrix rose to 61.5. Why? Maybe a rear seat configuration or a slightly longer wheelbase adjustment. Corolla is discounted on 12.3. Siena is still high at 148.9. The Sequoia index fell further to 120.8. The Venza is listed, but no capacity is listed. The Tacoma and Tundra still show dashes. The cargo capacity of trucks is not listed in this dataset. Maybe it had changed too much. Or maybe they just don’t care.
The advantages of a Volkswagen station wagon
Volkswagen took a different approach. In 2006, Rabbit led the industry with 46 cubic feet. Golf and GTI had the same score of 41.8. The Jetta has a smaller 16, the Beetle coupe 27.1 and the convertible is a pathetic 5. Phaeton is 13, Passat sedan 14.2.
Eos 10.5 was released in 2007. GTI jumped to 46 points. The Passat Wagon received a rating of 61.8. The Jetta is still 16. The Beetle Coupe is still 27.1. The Rabbit scored 46 points. The Touareg scored 71 points.
The score for the 2008 R32 was 43.4. GLI is 16 and Eos 10.5. Touareg 2 is 71. Rabbit is 46. Passat Wagon is 61.8. Beetle coupe is 27.1. Jetta 16
2009 was an interesting year for Volkswagen. The Jetta Sport Wagon received a rating of 66.9. Routan debuted with 141 cubic feet. A minivan in the Volkswagen range? Yes. Tiguan adds 56.1. Rabbit is 46, Touareg 2 is 71 and Passat Wagon 61.8. Beetle coupe is 27.1. 16 for the Jetta sedan. GLI is 16 and Eos 10.5. Routan is a beast. It’s about the same size as a Toyota Sienna.
Volvo’s understated practicality
Volvo does not advertise space. they just provide it. In 2006, the XC90 led the industry with 84.9 cubic feet. The result of the V70 and XC70 was 71.4. V50 is 62.9. S60 is 36.5. S80 is 14.4. S40 is 14.3. C70 is 12.8.
In 2007, the S60 dropped to 13.9. S80 rose to 14.9. The XC90 scored 85.1. V70 and XC70 are 71.4. V50 is 62.9. S40 is 14.3. C70 is 12.8. The changes are minimal. The Toyota S60’s cousin, the S80, has surprisingly little trunk space compared to an SUV.
In 2008, the C30 received a rating of 12.9. S40 counts down to 12.
